5Rs for Open Pedagogy
Respect
for the agency of students and creators, including whether they wish to perform public scholarship or not, and, if they do, what specific license or label they are comfortable applying to their intellectual property. Be mindful of the labour that goes into open pedagogy, visible and invisible. Not everything could or should be open. Open pedagogy without respect for agency is exploitation.
Reciprocate
by not just drawing on but also contributing back to the commons, by sharing resources, practices, and ideas and helping to build upon and contextualize the resources, practices, and ideas of others. Practice good citizenship of the commons. Open pedagogy is about community.
Risk
is ever present with open pedagogy, from the platforms that we utilize that mine and monetize our intellectual labour and the digital footprints that we require our students to leave in the course of their education to the open sharing of unpolished ideas and practices that leave us exposed and open to criticism and judgment. Open pedagogy involves vulnerabilities and risks that are not distributed evenly and that should not be ignored or glossed over. These risks are substantially higher for women, students and scholars of colour, precarious faculty, and many other groups and voices that are marginalized by the academy.
Reach
involves having an impact that extends well beyond the classroom, a course, or a semester, beyond the artificial divides between formal and informal learners, beyond what could possibly be envisioned when crafting precise and predetermined learning objectives. Open pedagogy takes on a life of its own because learning is living.
Resist
against forces that conspire to pit increasingly precarious faculty against increasingly precarious students. Resist against the commodification of learning. Resist against the neoliberal university. Resist being brokers for surveillance capitalism. Open pedagogy is not a panacea but it strives to be antiracist, democratizing, liberatory, and decolonized.
I am grateful to my dear friend and collaborator Robin DeRosa for providing me with feedback on this post.
Just love this sentence! “Beyond the artificial divides between formal and informal learners, beyond what could possibly be envisioned when crafting precise and predetermined learning objectives.”
I’m involved in teaching reading to those who have failed to learn through standardized reading programs. We tend to forget there is much more involved in learning to read than teaching letters and sounds. How we approach the teaching of reading is as important as what we are teaching.
Pingback: Theory vs. Practice (Part 1 of a Quest) | Upstream Downstream
Pingback: learning, teaching, living
Pingback: #OER and #ARCL2019: A Look at Open at the ACRL 2019 Biennial Conference
Pingback: Building Trust and Openness in Open – "Open" 4 Social Justice
I like this because it provides a much-needed ethical framework that is so obviously lacking in the “5R”s which reduces education to transactions and things.
Pingback: #OER and #ARCL2019: An Look at Open at the ACRL 2019 Biennial Conference - OER and Beyond
Pingback: Webinar Summary: Alternative Open Ontologies – Open Education and “El Museo Indigenista” – Iowa OER